As
you know from Twitter I’ve absolutely enjoyed reading ‘The Undertaker’s Gift’,
it really did blow me away. The story
never dipped once, never ran out of steam.
I finished that book and was totally breathless. It was truly WOW!
In
one part of the story I did think the pallbearers looked something familiar to
those white faced creatures that followed the Doctor to Trensalore but then realised
that perhaps they weren’t, but they still looked pretty freaky.
Trevor: Yes, there are some resemblances I
suppose – both appear to be based on pallbearers.
I
also noticed that there were two book covers for this book, the one in the
graveyard with Jack Harkness with the pallbearers behind created by Lee
Binding, and another with the creature in the glass casket with slightly more
about him than what was written about him in the book on the second, and with
Ianto in the cover. Was that for a
different market, such as some for UK and some for the US?
Trevor: No – the Ianto cover was the first
pass at a cover and to be perfectly honest I didn’t like it at all. The book
was, I thought, more Jack-centred anyway the picture of the creature in the
casket was completely wrong. I was far happier with the Jack cover, and it
probably doesn’t do any harm to have John Barrowman on the front of your book!
I’d
heard from a few other sources that some people disliked the book because it
was OOC (out of character) in the way Jack treated Ianto. Personally from my point of view and because
when I began reading the book I’d gone in with all these negative views, I
didn’t see that. I always find in books
that Ianto has a much better role in the stories than he does on the screen, is
this something you notice too? And did
you think Jack treated Ianto differently?
Trevor: Perhaps he does. I found the Jack/Ianto
romance a bit heavy-handed in the series and if I’m honest I could never really
understand Ianto’s character or role. He was a bit of a mystery to me and
difficult to empathise with. Every other character in the series was OK, I got
them, I understood who they were and where they were coming from. You get their
priorities, their likes and dislikes, the whole thing. But with Ianto I felt
nothing. He was unreadable to me. Plus, one of the key aspects of Jack’s
character, right from the outset, right from the start of series one episode
one, was his infatuation with Gwen. It runs like a thread throughout the
series, every series, and is a much more fascinating relationship because they
are both utterly committed elsewhere. Jack is a very sexual personality, but
not exclusively homosexual. There’s much more to him than that. Jack is a far
more complex and nuanced character. The will they/won’t they, do they/don’t
they romance between him and Gwen was subtler and more interesting than the
rather obvious Jack-Ianto relationship, and I wanted to
explore that a little more in my book. People who say Jack behaves OOC in this
respect are wrong. They tend to filter their interpretation of Jack’s feelings
and behaviour through the hindsight of Children of Earth, where the
relationship has moved on from the time of writing The Undertaker’s Gift.
I
also punched the air when I saw the mention of the recurring character
Nina.
When
I interviewed Peter Anghelides about his books, he mentioned that there were
three writers who had written their stories before the series had begun, which
made me think that perhaps a lot of the OOC comments were perhaps reflected
from this, perhaps not knowing the characters all that well, were you one of
the first writers?
Trevor: No, we were well into series two
when I wrote The Undertaker’s Gift. I still don’t think any of the regulars are
OOC in it.
The
idea of the ‘Black House’ where did that come from?
Trevor: The Black House was an idea for a
haunted house novel I had been toying with at the time. It found its way into
the Torchwood book the way these things do. I was writing Torchwood at the time
and it fitted.
I’m
still to read ‘Something in the Water’, that’s my next mission, but I usually
have to pace myself and throw a couple of James Patterson books into the mix
just to balance the violence out a bit.
Trevor: Something in the Water was written
first. I wasn’t quite as happy with it as I was with The Undertaker’s Gift. But
it is – unsurprisingly, you might say – quite violent.
Trevor: Not that I can share with you just
yet. It’s not been officially announced. It’s not Doctor Who or Torchwood
though.
All
your books are fantastically written and you know how much I enjoyed Wishing
Well with Doctor Who 10 and Martha, it was just a thrill to read. When you start writing what influences you to
write about what you do? Where do the characters come from, and the names for
the tiny creatures that ate through Ianto’s belly? Do you have some Doctor Who
creatures that you can use within your stories or are all of these plucked from
the air? I did like the idea of the bugs
actually.
Trevor: That’s such a difficult question to
answer. The truth is I really don’t know where the ideas and inspirations come
from – it’s probably a confluence of things, notions that occur and the time of
developing a story, ideas and characters and situations that have been waiting
for a suitable story to come along. Sometimes it’s inspiration, more often than
not it’s desperation. Sometimes things just click together, other times it
feels like you’re bashing away at plot points with a hammer just to make them
fit. Glad you liked the Xilobytes. I really can’t remember where the name came
from!
Fans
Questions:
Hazel
Stanton: You deal with some pretty gruesome and creepy scenes during The
Undertakers Gift, what inspires you and scares you?
Did
you find it difficult keeping the tones down for the teenage audiences in the
Doctor Who Books compaired to being able to let yourself go for the Torchwood
novels?
Pauline
Howard Have you a favourite Dr who story you have written
Trevor: That’s a tough one. The books I was
happiest with were Prisoner of the Daleks and The Deadstone Memorial, although
Fear of the Dark, which was reprinted this year as part of BBC Books’
celebration of Doctor Who’s 50th anniversary, comes close. Eater of
Wasps worked out pretty well too.
Mickie: Before you embarked on writing your first
novels for Torchwood and Doctor Who, did you watch any of the episodes first to
help fix in your head what made the characters tick?
Trevor: I didn’t need to watch any episodes
as part of any specific preparation or research; the characters were already
very fresh and clear in my mind. But I will have occasionally dipped into some
episodes, just to keep things ticking over, as I was writing. It’s surprising
what details – not necessarily personality traits, but little moments and
elements of particular speech patterns – you pick up when you know you’re
writing about a particular character.
Only because he is unable to understand the character of Ianto, he creates this non existing "romantic" relationship between Jack and that woman. And for the records, the only infatuation has been on the side of that woman, not on Jack's. He may have liked/loved her as a friend (until she tried deliver him to killers in MD probably) - but that's all. This author must have watched a different Torchwood. And obviously he hates the thought of the gay Jack-Ianto relationship. What a biased view imo. Thank you for posting this interview, so now I can spare me this "Gwack"-nonsense book. Thanks again!
ReplyDeleteOh, and I forgot. I didn't think at all that the Janto-romance was heavy-handed at all. it was only given too little room, imo.
ReplyDeleteAnd I could perfectly share my views with this author, what Iantos character/role was or where he came from, it's not that difficult.